Regarding those who are running for reelection, I would hope that you would vote for those who talk in terms of team work and accept ownership of all board decisions, especially when making regular posts to discussion boards and forums talking in the "me and I" instead of the "we and us." Strength comes in numbers. Board members are certainly allowed to disagree with one another and communicate their concerns. However, just because one disagrees with others on a vote made in executive session does not give that one the right to go public and discuss the way individual board members voted, including one's self. This is very divisive behavior. Details of how each member of the board votes in such instances is just as privileged as the discussion itself.
Regarding new candidates; are they qualified? For the most part it is easy to determine who is or is not qualified. Are they interested in the overall health and productivity of the association? They sure should be! Unfortunately that is not always the case and this election is no different. Some of the candidates have just one or two personal agenda items to fulfill. These people are almost always ultimately counter productive to a strong board.
This year we have more access to information to use in making informed decisions than ever before. Details will be published in the association's official journal as well as along with your ballot. Also, for the first time, the candidate's forum was streamed live from New Orleans and may be reviewed at www.youtube.com
Of the 14 candidates applying for seven seats several of them will make good board members. Become fully aware of who they are and what they stand for! More qualifications are required than just thinking their normal job experience is enough. Those who clearly love the ANA and ALL its members regardless of their station in life are very likely the best candidates.
No comments:
Post a Comment